Obligatory Terri Schiavo Post
When I first started hearing about Terri Schiavo, I assumed it was the usual suspects keeping someone from dying when all hope of a life is gone. I assumed that the husband, Michael, had done all he could to determine that Terri was beyond any possibility of recovery from a degenerative mental state. And I was hoping they would let her die, while administering whatever pain killers would be required to make her end as peaceful as possible. Which is what I would want should I ever be a mental vegetable.
Then I read this entry from Steve H.. As it turns out, Michael has done very little for his wife since he won a large monetary judgement in her favor. What really pushed me over the edge was the following:
There is considerable evidence that Mr. Schiavo has no interest in his wife’s welfare. He refuses to permit the physical therapy patients in Terri’s state generally receive. Although a CAT scan of Terri’s brain has been done, he refuses to allow PET and MRI scans, which are the best diagnostic tools for determining whether enough of her brain exists to sustain consciousness. And witnesses claim Terri has lost teeth and developed bedsores as a result of neglect.
and furthermore:
On top of all that, there is a very disturbing affidavit from a former caregiver. Here is a quote from the sworn statement of RN Carla Sauer Iyer:
“Throughout my time at Palm Gardens, Michael Schiavo was focused on Terri’s death,” the RN noted. “Michael would say ‘When is she going to die?’ ‘Has she died yet?’ and ‘When is that bitch gonna die?’”
As a lawyer, I can tell you that a sworn statement is considered much more credible when the statement works against the person who made it. If I swear I owe you money, that statement is automatically more credible than my sworn statement that I don’t owe you money. It appears to me that Ms. Iyer has made a statement that could damage her career very, very badly. Depending on the circumstances under which the statement was made and the purpose for which it was used, she may also have exposed herself to a libel suit or a perjury conviction.
Before getting the facts, which are summarized here, I believed that this was a case in which the husband was fighting for what his wife wanted in the face of opposition of the parents. He claimed that she would never want to be kept alive under these circumstances. No one else in Terri’s life had ever heard her make any statement along those lines. We have to take Michael at his word, in the face of the $800K life insurance policy on Terri. And again, I believed Michael had done everything he could to make sure that the diagnosis was correct. I made the mistake of assuming that it was possible he was acting in good faith.
Michael is obviously not acting in good faith. The monetary judgement provided plenty of money to provide for futher diagnosis and care. Michael does not care at all about Terri. He maintains his marriage to control Terri, and to allow himself to eventually recieve the $800K.
Michael is acting like a monster. His only move right now should be to give up all custodial rights on Terri in favor of her parents. He can always claim as an excuse that he found Jesus and was reborn* and that he realized that he had been wrong, the scales had fallen from his eyes, etc. Then he could receive that 1 million dollars offered up by some kind soul for letting Terri live in leiu of the life insurance policy. I think that would be a win-win situation for him.
I think if the news outlets, including my beloved FoxNewz, had been reporting the facts properly, very few people would be in favor of letting Terri starve to death as things currently stand. However, the media have again failed to report things properly.
As of 3/21/05, 4:30 pm central time, Fox News has reported that the feeding tube will not be reinserted.
*I happen to believe in G-d, and I further believe that some people have been reborn, but I’m cynical enough to believe that many people who claim to have been reborn are hypocrites.